Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by mox1 1140 days ago
You licensed the code as MIT - https://github.com/ofek/csi-gcs/blob/master/LICENSE-MIT

Are you saying you have an issue with them copying your MIT licensed code?
2 comments
soraminazuki 1140 days ago
If the GP is right, Google is violating the terms of the license. A quick search of the code reveals that Google's code doesn't include copyright headers with attribution to the GP. This could be stolen code.
link
ofek 1140 days ago
Yes, copying the code without following up to actually collaborate or even forking to show attribution I think is bad practice for such a large organization, or any entity for that matter.
link
toyg 1140 days ago
Just to clarify - the licenses you chose do not require any collaboration or "give back", they only require minimal attribution buried in some readme.

You can absolutely berate them for copying without attribution, but that's it; they don't owe you anything else.

link
tantalor 1140 days ago
If that's what you want, then update your license to require that.
link
ofek 1140 days ago
Are you of the opinion that because a behavior is legal that necessarily makes it right in all cases? If so, I suppose that is where I disagree.
link
warent 1140 days ago
You seem to be interpreting a license as a legal formality that shouldn't be taken so literally.

It is a form of very explicit and literal communication. Unfortunately you sent an unambiguous message to the world inviting them to do this.

(Disclaimer that I briefly worked at Google years ago)

EDIT: Well OP did not give them permission to alter the license. Sorry this happened to you. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35791737

link
joecool1029 1140 days ago
If their behavior annoys you, why not DMCA takedown the repo in retaliation for them stripping the copyright header? It'd be within your rights since they violated the license and sends a message they can't ignore.

Otherwise if you're upset they otherwise used code you released under a permissive license that's a personal problem. You signaled to the world that you'd relax your copyright under a permissive license and don't like the results? This is like gifting something and being mad about how the gift was used.

As others have pointed out you don't seem to grasp why licenses exist in the first place? No org or individual in general wants to play guessing games and risk liability. It's entirely on you to signal how you want your work to be used.

link