[ajross]

> there isn't a plausible generalizable principle of "just don't discriminate"

You'd at least agree that there ought to be an extremely high bar for "do not hire" exclusions like this, no?

It seems like both of you are interpreting what I wrote above in a senselessly absolutist way, which seems deeply uncharitable. I'm all for debating moral ethics in the abstract. I'm just a little horrified to see two major thought leaders on this site engaging in this particular direction.

[tptacek]

Absolutely. I assume he would too. I don't have an opinion about what you wrote, but I make a habit of reading all of Berlin's comments, and it seemed like you two were just communicating at cross purposes. I'm not judging or anything.