[AlecSchueler]

Extremely inexpensive is infinitely expensive when you're a 13 year old with 2 dollars to your name.

[loeg]

It does not need to be literally the same thing to be a useful point of comparison, which is the nitpick argument bumby was making.

[bumby]

Not nitpicking, I’m just saying a weak analogy doesn’t strengthen your case. Equating sugar to porn misses some of the important aspects of what makes porn potentially dangerous.

[AlecSchueler]

I was replying to your own position of it being extremely inexpensive. I understand that comparisons and metaphors are never 1 to 1. If you have another point to make then I'll gladly hear it out.