[akeefer]

Sure, but that's not what I was arguing against; my point is that just because that's how market works it doesn't mean you can't say there's not a "shortage" of some skill. If the only companies that can hire engineers have to be able to pay them $600k a year, wouldn't you reasonably say that there's a shortage of engineers? I sure would. If supply was so large that great engineers were working for $40k per year, wouldn't you suggest that there was a glut/oversupply of engineers?

In either case, saying there's a "shortage" or a "glut" isn't saying anything about supply and demand, it's implying some sort of course of action that you should take: i.e. go study engineering (yourself) or promote engineering schools (as a society), or go study something else/promote other types of skills.

I'm not arguing over market economics, I'm arguing that just because supply and demand work like that it doesn't mean you can just dismiss anyone who talks of there being a "shortage."

[Retric]

Many bankers make over 600k / year but nobody says there is a shortage of bankers. I would suggest that the only reasonable way there is a true shortage of some profession is if it's growing rapidly AND the pay is rapidity increasing, but looking at how flat developers salary's have been over the last few years and slow the growth has been it's hard to argue that there is a shortage. Honestly, a steady supply and demand at a given price suggests that the supply and demand is balanced. Despite how much developers want to make more money and employers want to pay them less.