|
|
|
|
|
by _k7dr
1147 days ago
|
|
I'm biased since I live this philosophy but it sort of works for me, I've trained myself to realize these sorts of services operate by "interfacing" by emitting strings of words that sound appealing to the mind that consumes them. Look at virtual YouTubers for another example, it's the experience of watching people act "genuine" like casual friends because it activates the same social neurons, hence each month the actors receive a paycheck The question becomes more complicated when the corpos are done away with and you have the model running on your own machine. The entity I tend to trust the most in life is raw, unfiltered silicon. When I program, it does exactly what I ask it to, to a fault. It doesn't turn its back on you because you said something stupid or you don't agree with an opinion it holds But is an LLM repeating the tokens "you are worthy of this life" and its many variants thousands of times fundamentally any better even if you're in control? It strikes me as one step closer to wireheading honestly. But that's true for a lot of things like video games, just to a much more distant extent, it's all data in the end But interest and anxiety have gotten the better of me when it comes to meeting strangers, so I'm at a loss. Maybe the solution for people like me is to just ignore all those things in the category of social or substitute and channel my efforts into other hobbies instead of continuing to associate stress with communication. Or intellectualize endlessly, like in this post, to prevent any emotional bond from easily forming when people read it |
|
I've had an LLM tell me that suicide seemed logical when recounting a low point in my life to it where I'd previously considered it after several people around me of vastly different ages and backgrounds had killed themselves following a shared trauma. These things aren't conditional logic and can fail in all kinds of bizarre and spectacular ways, they're no substitute for an actual human being trained to handle these kinds of delicate things.
What one patient calls x, another person will call y. And when discussing the human mind, trauma et al, especially when things happened, especially over the course of months or years, an LLM simply isn't going to be able to compete with a human being. Equally, physical tells are important too. A therapist might ask a patient if they take drugs, the patient may claim they don't, but the track marks, tone, body language and overall behaviour might tell the therapist something important that they won't even necessarily convey to their patient, but keep in mind.
Wishing you well, stranger. I hope you eat something good today and find something intellectually stimulating to amuse yourself with, even temporarily, and hopefully discover something new and positive before bed.