|
|
|
|
|
by jglamine
1142 days ago
|
|
Yeah, I was confused because I felt like the article didnt do a good job of clearly stating Hilton's beliefs - it was meandering around. Felt off. Then I saw the Cade Metz byline at the end and became instantly sceptical of everything I had just read. Metz is more interested in pushing a nerative than reporting the truth. He doesn't outright lie, just heavily implys things and frames his articles in a misleading way. |
|
Sounds like Scott's methods on neoreactionary and eugenics stuff.