|
|
|
|
|
by sanderjd
1147 days ago
|
|
See, this is it right here, you're doing it! You're resorting to extremist hyperbole, when what matters are actual details. Resources are not infinite, but that is not relevant. What is relevant is the (finite) amount and the rate at which they are used. To go hyperbolic in the other direction, if there are a trillion accessible grams of something and humanity uses a kilogram a year, then we won't run out for a billion years. But both your hyperbole and mine are pointless. The question can't be answered without the actual details. Your argument is just "resources aren't infinite so we shouldn't use any of them!" That's not a good argument. Another thing people often seem to miss when comparing lithium for batteries to oil for combustion, is that lithium is not a fuel in a battery, it's a vessel. It doesn't get burned up. Whether we can recycle it efficiently enough is a big open question, but it's not gone the way fossil fuels are. |
|