|
|
|
|
|
|
by PaulDavisThe1st
1143 days ago
|
|
|
> I think the thought process behind "supporting one unified platform-independent bytecode would be easier than compiling a .so that works with all GNU libc versions" is straightforward and self-evident. Do you disagree? 1. it doesn't really matter what I think 2. Compiling a .so that works with all glibc versions is almost certainly an order of magnitude easier than providing a unified wasm implementation that works on (at least) 3 platforms. |
|
|