[frontman1988]

Companies don't allow that. people won't risk their jobs to earn a few bucks

[kingkongjaffa]

Yep there's 0 incentive to allow this by the actual decision makers (companies) to open themselves up to sending potentially law-suite leading footage to a 3rd party.

[oshinubijoshua]

Completely valid point, but what if we invest so much in anonymizing the recordings, so that it is not possible to identify the companies or jobseekers involved?

[kmoser]

Good luck with that. Programmers are good at de-anonymizing data, and video of people having a conversation is ripe for being de-anonymized.

[oshinubijoshua]

But the videos are completely anonymized... So no one who know who recorded who, or what do you think?

[Our_Benefactors]

This is a bad idea for so many reasons. For starters, you’re not going to be able to use any video where the interviewer is in a two-party consent state, and good luck determining where an interviewer is currently located with 100% confidence.

[hgsgm]

Remove the audio and video of the people involved, keep the rest. Not very useful.

[squirtle24]

What about a real-time voice-to-text transcription of the interview?