[hammyhavoc]

Has a lawyer looked over your contract and confirmed that it is actually legally valid? Can you name said lawyer and the firm they work at?

Would you be willing to publish the contract with sensitive information redacted?

All these bold claims are just claims until people come up with some substance. Talk is cheap and confirmation bias happens all the time.

[TrueSlacker0]

All you need for a bill of sale is a simple sentence saying on x date I xxx, sale vehicle xxx, with vin number xxx to xxx person. Then write the driver's license of both parties and sign. A lawyer is extreme overkill for such a simple transaction.

[hammyhavoc]

By the same logic, a hallucinating LLM is also overkill versus just doing the simple task yourself and not needlessly adding risk to it.

The point still remains: let's see what the LLM delivered that the user actually used. Either it's legally binding and an appropriate use, or it's not fit-for-purpose.

Equally, why not an interactive form using conditional logic? No hallucination possible. Much more simple and reliable.

[ceejayoz]

> All you need for a bill of sale is a simple sentence saying on x date I xxx, sale vehicle xxx, with vin number xxx to xxx person.

If you know this, you don't need GPT.

If you don't know this, you don't have a way to assess GPT's attempts at a contract. A bill of sale is indeed simple, but there's a lot of more subtle legal issues someone might run into in life.