I use food (including peanut butter) in cooking. I cook in the kitchen. Therefore peanut butter is a thing I use in the kitchen. Seems correct and proper to me.
The ambiguity as I see it is that the kitchen isn't the only place I use peanut butter. I've eaten it (which I think counts as "using") in other rooms. I've even made peanut-butter sandwiches (properly "using" it) in the living room before.
Well, the alleged point is challenged. If playing this game, the questioner must constantly verify that the other party is using the language properly, you'll exhaust that 20 q limit rather quickly.
- is it used in the kitchen?
- yes.
- [well, kitchen appliances, here we go ..] is it ..?
...
- [aha. meat intelligence no speak proper English?] Is this thing you use in kitchen edible?
- Oh, yeah.
- [oh dear. we can not let meat machines govern this planet...]
Yes. You use edible things in preparing or cooking food (which may happen in the kitchen). 'Use' maps to food prep (the act) but never to prep location. Only in cases where the thing has both general edible and food preparation usage -- "I use honey extensively in the kitchen" for example -- does "use" and "edible" make sense.
But peanut butter has general edible and food preparation usage quite similar to honey, doesn't it? You can spread it on a slice of bread to eat directly or use it as a baking ingredient, but you probably wouldn't eat it by the spoonful straight from the container. (Or maybe that's how people usually eat peanut butter, I kind of don't want to know.)
The ambiguity as I see it is that the kitchen isn't the only place I use peanut butter. I've eaten it (which I think counts as "using") in other rooms. I've even made peanut-butter sandwiches (properly "using" it) in the living room before.