[logicchains]

>What are you talking about? HPV is by far the simplest, cheapest and safest method of preventing a HPV induced cervix and throat cancer for a few decades already.

There is no evidence for it preventing any kind of cancer, not a single study supporting it. The HPV trial clinical only showed reduced incidence of the HPV strains the virus targets, over a short observation window. I.e. the same kind of study that showed the covid vaccines as 90%+ effective, when in fact far more than 10% of the vaccinated population ended up catching covid.

[amanaplanacanal]

They were effective against the strains circulating at the time. They probably also helped protect against hospitalization and death even in those that caught it.

[dennis_jeeves1]

You are correct, to the extent I investigated they is no hard evidence for _any_ vaccine working. Somehow things are manipulated to give the appearance of it being effective. Example: In the Pfizer COVID vaccine trials both placebo and vaccine groups fell ill at the same rate, however since the placebo group group showed more COVID positives in the PCR test ( a dubious test), they arrived at the 95% effectiveness rate. The way 95% was calculated is also a complete travesty of commonsense. At this point I'm not even sure if any data is real, or completely made up. If I recollect in flu vaccine trails they check for antibodies in the participants, not actual incidence of the flu.