|
|
|
|
|
by dsfyu404ed
1141 days ago
|
|
>Most folks on HN realize that "the military", in the sense of "the current general and admirals", have damn little influence over these outsourcing, single-sourcing, etc. decisions. That is mostly controlled by Congress, I think your claim is way to optimistic in light of the fact there are other people claiming that the LCS boondoggle is the fault of faulty procurement and not Congress. |
|
The LCS is the fault of the Navy in at least three ways:
- they didn’t bother to make sure the gearbox worked
- they didn’t bother to make sure the structural framing was sufficient, leading to shoulder cracks
- they didn’t design it to have sufficient arms or ability to perform ASW roles
None of which has to do with Congress, and every bit of which has to do with military design, procurement, and contract management.
Congress doesn’t design ships for the fleet: the Navy proposes what they want and Congress funds (or doesn’t) the project. The only role Congress played was forcing the Navy to keep them after it became clear they were such a total failure, the Navy scrapped the class while still in production.
But keep making excuses for abject failure — that’s sure to fix the problem.