|
|
|
|
|
|
by josephg
1153 days ago
|
|
|
Yeah also note that 335kb of wasm isn't as bad as 335kb of javascript. Its true that large javascript bundles are bad because big files take longer to download. But the arguably larger problem is that parsing javascript is really slow. This isn't as big an issue with wasm - the browser can parse wasm many times faster than it parses javascript. If I recall correctly, wasm parsing speed is about on par with the speed of parsing pngs. So having 335kb of wasm is similar to having a 335kb image on your landing page. Its not ideal, but its not a showstopper. |
|
|