|
|
|
|
|
|
by altacc
1146 days ago
|
|
|
In my comment I didn't actually refer to the editing of documents, it was more a meta comment on the definition of history. > They are altering existing works written by people who are long dead, without making it clear to the reader/viewer what has been changed. Have you heard of this thing called "the bible"? It's been regularly altered for almost 2000 years without making it clear to the reader/viewer how and why. Yes, that's a hyperbolic point but it's to show that editing of past works is not new. Writings, paintings, stories, etc... have long been edited and referred to as the original. |
|
|
... in an era where scientific rigor, proper editorial practices, literary science, and indeed the entire humanities in the modern sense didn't exist. That's a laughable comparison.
If anyone tried to publish an "edited" Bible like that today, they would get publicly crucified by scholars.