[tothrowaway]

> Ultimately, the court’s CalECPA analysis proved fatal to the defendants’ case. Despite ruling the warrant violated the Fourth Amendment, the court refused to suppress the evidence, finding the officers acted in good faith based on a facially valid warrant.

Incredible. This is like the government version of a corporation laundering its bad behavior through an undercapitalized shell company to shield it from liability.

[paws]

I'm not knowledgeable about CalECPA, but I sure don't see why officers who 'acted in good faith' should be a basis for violating the peoples' 4th amendment rights.

[snark42]

It's the good faith exception to the exclusionary rule, you can thank the Supreme Court.

[seandrawling]

Humans of normalized biological features exhibit similar states of logic and behavior.

It’s almost as if the language of “politician” and “business leader” create a fake world of hallucination and it’s all just meat popsicles jockeying for economic clout.