|
|
|
|
|
|
by LoganDark
1145 days ago
|
|
|
> Not me. Eh, whatever. I originally thought whoever meant. can't edit the comment now. > On Classic MacOS, some files, all the actual contents is in the resource fork, and the data fork is ignored and can be empty. So you copy such a file to a filesystem which doesn't support resource forks, you can end up with an empty file. Yeah, that's about what I thought. That makes sense, thank you~ |
|
|