[kqr]

I liked /Rapid Development/ too. It misses out on things like the Unix philosophy and worse-is-better, which are sort of previous incarnations of the agile/lean stuff that is very popular today.

I would assume the author just hadn't had much exposure to those ideas so they weren't even considered for inclusion. (Besides, they tend to not be researched so actively because they don't leave as many paper trails.)

Other than that gripe, though, I learned a lot from it!

[ChrisMarshallNY]

McConnell has never really been a fan of “purist” Agile.

Construx eventually developed a curriculum around a fairly “corporate-friendly” version of Scrum, that I never found that appealing.

The way I write code, these days, makes Agile look like Orthodox religion.

However, it’s highly dependent upon me, being who I am, and a lifetime of habit and personal process. It would probably not scale well.

McConnell has always been about introducing process, metrics, and rigor to software development. I don’t think he’d be thrilled with the way I do stuff.

WFM. YMMV.

[kqr]

I don't expect him to like it, just mention it in any way whatsoever!

[warrenm]

RAD was written in 1996

"Agile Development" (under that name, at least) didn't really appear on the scene til nearly the end of the decade

Precursors to it were there (spiral development, pair programming, etc) ... but kinda hard to write about something that didn't exist yet :)