As someone who knows barely enough to be dangerous, I like this. I'm sure it leaves enough out to make most experts angry, but it makes a lot of sense to me.
> I'm sure it leaves enough out to make most experts angry
It's not that it leaves out details, it's that the articles metaphors are not actually correct in regards to the way deep learning works.
This post mostly confuses both reinforcement learning and ensemble models with deep learning. If you only enough "enough to be dangerous" then this post will steer your intuition in the wrong direction.
It's not that it leaves out details, it's that the articles metaphors are not actually correct in regards to the way deep learning works.
This post mostly confuses both reinforcement learning and ensemble models with deep learning. If you only enough "enough to be dangerous" then this post will steer your intuition in the wrong direction.