|
|
|
|
|
by soco
1146 days ago
|
|
From what I can tell, the provocative ideas exposed on less than two rows of text are the ones getting downvotes. If I can dissent with a well written text, downvotes come very rarely, if ever. Which tells me dissent is acceptable (here) if it brings a story, proofs, younameit. And dissent for the sake of dissent, less. Which kind of mirrors real life, right? |
|
Unfortunately, votes are meant to be used to judge comment quality but most people use them to try and penalize or reward views they already have regardless of merit. It's easy to get voted up by +100 simply by making snarky low value comments that agree with the current HN vibe, and a long comment with 5 citations will easily sit at 0 or -1 if it's ideologically inconvenient.