|
|
|
|
|
|
by liorben-david
1155 days ago
|
|
|
Completely Agree. Part of the issue feels like that the people working on this are far more on the Math side than on the CS side. Like Gunnar Carlson's textbook and papers about Persistent Homology are geared towards algebraic topologists when there is probably a way to explain Persistent Homology that does not rely on category theory, polynomial rings, etc |
|
|