[courgette]

Yes fully agreed.

The scale and cadence of it seems to be different.

Also, once again Karl ideas of “ownership of the means of copying and training” seems like it will be relevant.

I have nothing cleaver to say; I agree with you. Just wanted to add some colors.

I find it sad that IP laws can be enforced ruthlessly in a case. And fully ignored in another.

Actually, musing; I have something to say:

We could force AI manufacturers to reveal what the data underlying the training; and use IP at that stage to effect some repartitions.

Raws BOM-style list of training data should not reveal their secret sauce? ( actually question )