[to11mtm]

Subaru embraced belt type CVTs because they provide better mileage than an automatic. The CVTs do have issues (mostly around cooling, is my understanding) but Mileage/Emissions are already hard for them I'd imagine.

> untenable in the age of electric cars

Frankly, Subaru is in a tough spot with that. Most of Subaru's unique 'value prop' outside of JDM is that their overall design makes for a fairly cheap but effective AWD system. AFAICT there's no good 'translation' to that for an electric car.

Mazda... I'm of the opinion they probably suffered a bit from Ford divesting most/all of their interest in them. (OTOH, Ford has suffered a bit, the more Ford tries to 'improve' the otherwise very reliable Mazda 4Cyl designs the more problems they seem to have...)

[KRAKRISMOTT]

Modern 8-speed+ automatics are competitive, especially if you throw in some hybrid technology. Toyota's eCVTs are best in class (Ford also arrived at the same solution by dint of convergent engineering). They are much better than belt type CVTs. Subaru is now a Toyota partner just like Mazda, they have access to all the engineering they could want. Subaru and Mazda used to be enthusiasts' favored brand, now they are just making same boring commuter cars as everyone else. The WRX engineering has been split off from the Impreza, and the Mazda 3 is evangelizing torsion beams and gating standard safety features behind higher trims in the age of multi link suspension and self driving.

At this rate I might as well get an AWD Prius. Terribly disappointed with Subaru. It's not like they are unaware of the problems, visit any Subaru forum/subreddit and the common complaints are very obvious.