|
|
|
|
|
by AstralStorm
1149 days ago
|
|
The problem with it is this is actually burning many millions of US taxpayer dollars. You think Musk is paying for it? Check SpaceX grants. As for the failure, the Raptor 2 failures have caused a RUD on multiple Starship launches so far.
They should be back to static firing the Super Heavy or something, but this is not sexy enough for the billionaire. Until the engine and launchpad works reliably, there is literally no point in launching the boosters when you have high probability of mission failure right at the launch. (Even if it clears the tower.) Musk/SpaceX redefining failure as success is terribly annoying too. If done repeatedly enough it has the potential to tank the whole space program. They obviously wanted to test separation the most (since it was issued despite the control failure) and that failed too. |
|
> Thursday's launch was hailed as "a real accomplishment" and "so successful" by NASA Administrator Bill Nelson and retired International Space Station Commander Chris Hadfield, respectively. SpaceX agreed.
https://www.npr.org/2023/04/21/1171202753/spacex-starship-la...