|
|
|
|
|
by Szpadel
1151 days ago
|
|
keep in mind this is still a prototype rocket, they have no guarantee that they won't learn anything important about how this should look like or what issues it could introduce they used something they knew to work so there is one less variable that should prevent liftoff at this point there is no reducing the cost phase yet, they try to test assumptions and learn what and how things can go wrong. It's much better that things go wrong at test flight than at mission flight. if they would get lucky and none of the issues would manifest, they could assume that design is perfect and do not try to improve it. so it's good if whatever can go wrong goes wrong at test flight |
|
I agree that the success should be measured in lessons learned from the launch. However we learned next to nothing about the second stage because the first stage failed for reasons that weren't unexpected.
So from that perspective the launch could be considered a failure, because they traded getting data on the second stage for learning a lesson that was already known.