| Not sure what your evidence is. Here's my list of studies of vegetarian and vegan children that disprove your claims: * https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/11/4/832/htm * https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00394-021-02753-3 * https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/13/5/1707/htm * https://academic.oup.com/ajcn/article/113/6/1565/6178918 * https://anthropogoniquescom.files.wordpress.com/2019/08/grow... * https://anthropogoniquescom.files.wordpress.com/2019/08/grow... * https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1365-277X.... * https://www.minervamedica.it/en/journals/minerva-pediatrics/... * https://www.embopress.org/doi/full/10.15252/emmm.202013492 All concluded that vegan diets were healthy for children as long as the parents knew the common deficiencies (B12) and fed their children enough calories. The study you cited is on my list because it seems you didn't read the results where it stated that most children were not eating fortified or supplemented food like Vitamin D, which could easily explain why they have a lower bone density. |
I provided a study in my very first comment. Did you read it? I'll provide it again for you here: (https://academic.oup.com/ajcn/article/113/6/1565/6178918?log...) The study found vegan children to be at risk of lower stature and bone density.
Thank you for the studies, I have reviewed them. In turn:
1. Please review Figure 2. Children on vegan and vegetarian diets presented with higher rates of "stunted or severely stunted," as per the WHO criteria used. This is discussed and confirmed later in the study. The study did not measure bone density at all.
2. This is the same study cited as above.
3. This study explored neither height nor bone density. The blood levels of studied macro-nutrients were in the healthy range, and that's good.
4. In a fascinating twist of fate, you cited the study I cited above, which finds that vegan children are at risk of lower stature and bone density. I'm not sure you read these studies if you think this study confirms your beliefs.
5. This study found that vegetarian children were both shorter, and weighed less. They did not measure bone density.
6. This study found, like the rest, that vegan children were shorter and weighed less. They did not measure bone density.
7. This study, once again, found children to be lighter and shorter. They did not measure bone density.
8. This study, once again, found children to be lighter and lower in "growth percentile." The study did not measure bone density.
9. It's hard to parse this study. The omnivorous children were taller than the vegetarians, but shorter than the vegans. However the vegan cohort was only six in total. Further, the vegetarian children were heavier than the omnivores. These results are the opposite of all of the studies you cited. It is an interesting data point, but it doesn't appear to lend credence to either of our arguments. It's clear that some delta occurs as a result of vegan, vegetarian, and omnivorous diets, and given the wealth of evidence you've submitted, it's clear that vegetarian and especially vegan diets usually result in poorer growth. The study did not measure bone density.
I'm not sure you read these studies very thoroughly. I suppose I should thank you for providing so much corroborative evidence that vegan diets are dangerous for children.