Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by the_mungler 1152 days ago
This is still in the USA. They still had to get approval from the EPA to set up all of this stuff. I realize this comment is satire, but the reason this location was chosen has to do with orbital mechanics. A launch pad close to the equator can send payloads to a larger range of orbital inclinations.
1 comments

Your comment makes me wonder why Mexico doesn’t have a launch facility. And if I remember correctly Costa Rica actually builds rocket parts.
You're right, Mexico would be a better place to launch rockets from. You want to be close to the equator, and on an east coast so you can launch rockets over the water and avoid dropping boosters on people. Rockets generally are launched to the east to take advantage of Earth's rotation (we're all moving about 1,000 mph to the east, so launching west requires about 2,000mph extra Delta v). SpaceX is a USA company, and I believe their rocket technology is considered a government secret and must stay in the USA. So that's why SpaceX themselves aren't putting launch pads in Mexico.

Also I believe equatorial orbits are still possible to achieve from USA launch sites, it just means more fuel/ reduced payload.

Interestingly, the James Webb telescope was launched from French Guiana, which is almost right on the equator.

Also Israel is one of the few countries that regularly launches their rockets to the west, as they only have a West Coast.

If the earth is rotating to the east, and we launch a rocket that drops boosters from the east coast, doesn't that mean that the land mass would move under where the boosters would drop? Wouldn't the earth need to be rotating towards the west for it to move the land mass away from the launch site?
It you are in a room, and you jump, does the wall suddenly slam into you at 1,000 mph? Why or why not?
Because I already have momentum from the earth, but a rocket will be disconnected from the earth for far longer than I would be jumping. The path of a rocket would start to curve away from the launch site due to no longer being connected from the earth for such a long time.
1) An object will maintain its momentum forever unless some force acts upon it.

2) In the case of the rocket, it accelerates eastward. Even if parts fall off, and they slow down because of the drag of the atmosphere, and they slow down all the way to the speed of the atmosphere, the atmosphere is more or less moving eastward at the same speed as the earth's rotation, so any part would be unlikely to land any further west than where it detached from the rocket. And if there was no atmosphere on earth any part that fell off a rocket during its ascent to orbit would fall according to a ballistic trajectory and would most certainly land farther east than where it fell.

That's Aristotle physics.
It's more complicated than that.

For example, even though Rocket Lab was founded in New Zealand it is now a US based company. It operates launch facilities both in New Zealand and the US and pretty sure it builds stuff in both countries.

What government secrets?
Rockets fall under some pretty big restrictions government wise. You know, guided missiles and all that. While SpaceX is a private company, the people allowed to work on their rockets are very much restricted. I believe they can employ Americans and Canadians, but anyone else is not allowed to work there.
The European Space Agency launches out of French Guiana in South America for this reason.

I assume we don't launch out of Mexico because rocket technology is tightly controlled by ITAR, so there's no way the government would allow any of it to go to another country's sovereign territory.

On the other hand the United States has a lot of overseas colonies which are nearer to the equator. Puerto Rico, US Virgin Islands in the Caribbean, a lot of atolls in the pacific, Guam. Even Hawaii is more southern.

I assume shipping to the launch pads is a major issue, especially for the Apollo, Space Shuttle and SLS programs which were/are build all over the place in the continental US.