[blueyoda]

Just searched for her name, and the first result was a NBC news article titled "Covid vaccines for children are coming. So is misinformation". Nowhere in the article is her name even mentioned. I'm curious as to how this is my first search result on Google.

Now back to her case, the law firm's page about this case says that doctors initially said "Maddie’s Anxiety Is Causing Her Symptoms". Then, "the hospital referred Maddie to psychologists as they believed that Maddie’s symptoms arose from her anxiety."

This directly matches the dictionary definition of "gaslighting".

I've lost count of how many times I've heard doctors attributing something they don't know/understand to "anxiety". A genuine question - how is the notion of a serious side effect dismissed and considered "correlation", yet anxiety is absolutely ruled as "causation"?

[VagueMag]

Yeah de Garay is an interesting case because there are no articles deboonking her particular case as having been caused by the vaccine. I've been surprised they didn't at least find some tout doctor somewhere to say, "there is no evidence that de Garay's symptoms were caused by the vaccine," but maybe in this particular case the usual denials would just be too flimsy and suspect. But it should be a huge slap in the face to anyone operating from a mindset of "if there were any big issues I would have heard about them" -- the adolescent trials were so small that if her adverse event had been properly included, the vaccines clearly would have been too hazardous to administer in that age group.

> A genuine question - how is the notion of a serious side effect dismissed and considered "correlation", yet anxiety is absolutely ruled as "causation"?

Even better: the same side effects are invariably attributed to post-infection sequelae in anyone who had a breakthrough case!