|
|
|
|
|
|
by circuit10
1152 days ago
|
|
|
Then by that definition AI training has no goal, it's simply a process defined by calculations. But whether you want it call it a goal or not, the fact remains that they look very, very much like goals. "If it looks like a duck, swims like a duck, and quacks like a duck, then it probably is a duck." > It's plausible that AI "goals" emerge evolutionarily as well AI training is vaguely similar to evolution, except more efficient and directed |
|
|
No, the very definition of training is that there is a goal which to train for. Those calculations were created by humans with goals. For LLMs, the goal is token prediction.
Evolution has no training.