[bastardoperator]

I think it's pretty clear. If you're not filtering, you're liable. If you are and something transpires, they'll fight your legal battle for you which is probably better than any monetary indemnity clause. I assume this is for enterprise users where it actually matters.

[blibble]

> I think it's pretty clear.

without an Agreement in sight, it's not, the two terms conflict with each other as there's no clear precedence

(I think it's likely that there's an indemnity clause in any Agreement though!)

[bastardoperator]

Looks like copilot is pretty upfront:

Matched content:

n ; Ap = A->p ; Ai = A->i ; Ax = A->x ; for (j = 0 ; j < n ; j++) { for (p = Ap [j] ; p < Ap [j+1] ; p++) { y [Ai [p]] += Ax [p] * x [j]

License Summary

This snippet matches 500 references to public code. Below, you can find links to a sample of 50 of these references.

NOASSERTION (405)

MIT (26)

GPL-3.0 (19)

BSD-3-Clause (16)

GPL-2.0 (11)

Apache-2.0 (7)

BSD-2-Clause (7)

LGPL-3.0 (6)

LGPL-2.1 (3)

File References

Match Location Repo License

ChRis6/circuit-simulation Unknown license

AndySomogyi/SuiteSparse Unknown license

ru-wang/slam-plus-plus Unknown license

Cruvadio/invariant_measures Unknown license

nishant-sachdeva/rrc-g2o Unknown license

alecone/ROS_project Unknown license

gustavopr/HANK Unknown license

lcnbeapp/beapp Unknown license

imod-mirror/IMOD Unknown license

clach/MPM Unknown license

MagicPixel-Dev/cxsparse Unknown license

elshafeh/own Unknown license

squirrel-project/squirrel_nav Unknown license

lcnhappe/happe Unknown license

cix1/OpenSees Unknown license

pachamaltese/dulmagemendelsohn Unknown license

gina10287/Interactive-shape-manipulation-FinalProject Unknown license

GuillaumeFuchs/Ensimag Unknown license

w2fish/CSparse Unknown license

cffjiang/cis563-2019-assignment Unknown license

diesendruck/gp Unknown license

hendersk101401/jlabgroovy Unknown license

robhemsley/SuiteSparse Unknown license

Glaphy/Emission Unknown license

Glaphy/Emission Unknown license

daves-devel/ECE1387 Unknown license

anranknight/TE Unknown license

weigouheiniu/TE Unknown license

Datoow/fm Unknown license

chaoyan1037/openMVG_modified Unknown license

cran/igraph Unknown license

GHilmarG/UaSource Unknown license

ZhaoqunZhong/Kalibr-ubuntu18-ros-melodic Unknown license

hechzh/g2o Unknown license

Open-Systems-Pharmacology/OSPSuite.CPP-Toolbox Unknown license

elshafeh/own Unknown license

yizhang/riotstore Unknown license

sgalazka/porr_mtsp Unknown license

skydave/sandbox Unknown license

alitekin2fx/orb_slam2_android Unknown license

Tianhonghai/vslam14_note MIT

LRMPUT/PlaneSLAM MIT

albansouche/Open-GeoNabla GPL-3.0

khawajamechatronics/mrpt-1.5.3 BSD-3-Clause

3000huyang/suitesparse-metis-for-windows BSD-3-Clause

igraph/igraph GPL-2.0

LRMPUT/DiamentowyGrant Apache-2.0

kurshakuz/graduation-project BSD-2-Clause

ghorn/debian-casadi LGPL-3.0

rmcgibbo/tungsten LGPL-2.1

Looks like this code in https://github.com/ChRis6/circuit-simulation/blob/2e45c7db01... is older then the GPL code in question or provided by the example. Uh oh, did we discover something? Who actually owns this code because this code predates the code in question by a calendar year using git blame, by a different author, and with no license attached to the oldest code. Is it possible the code in the codeium.com example is relicensed and not GPL code at all?