[stale2002]

> Apple's leverage has given it de-facto regulatory power

Indeed. This is called "being an monopoly" and "using anti-competitive practices to control a market, in violation of anti monopoly laws".

Yes, anti competitive practices work.

Yes, being a monopoly works.

And yes, it has produced some good things like Apple's focus on privacy.

But it has also produced other very not good things, like the 30% Apple tax.

But, it is at least comforting that people are now saying the quiet part out loud, which is "yep, Apple had anti competitive market power the whole time, I just like monopolies".

[yamtaddle]

> But, it is at least comforting that people are now saying the white part out loud, which is "yep, Apple had anti competive power the whole time, I just like monopolies".

It's... been the entire argument, the whole time, for the "please don't change it" side. I'm not even aware of another angle on it. It's never been "quiet".

> I just like monopolies

I like my life being better than it might otherwise be. In this case, yes, that means I'd rather this monopoly stick around at least a while longer. I'm entirely not a fan of black-and-white positions on most issues. Monopolies generally suck. In this case, however, one particular monopoly seems to be giving me significant benefits I might not otherwise have. Now, if I could trade Apple's monopoly for a harsh crackdown on monopolies across the whole economy, that'd be easily worth it—yes, please. Just to "liberate" iOS devices, though? Nah, I'd rather they leave it alone.

[stale2002]

> . It's never been "quiet".

Well, it gets conveniently ignored anytime someone would bring up problems with said monopoly.

For example, the 30% Apple fee is a consequence of their anti-competitive market power.

And yet, if you start complaining about that, the response will be to pretend like the anti-competitive market power doesn't exist, and that you should just "go publish on a different app store" if you don't want to pay that monopolistic fee.

You can't have it both ways here. You cannot say that you like their monopoly power, and then pretend like it doesn't exist when the same exact market power allows Apple to extra 30% of the money from the app store market.

> Now, if I could trade Apple's monopoly....... Just to "liberate" iOS devices, though? Nah, I'd rather they leave it alone.

Well then you should blame Apple for the situation we are in now.

People wouldn't be forced to regulate Apple, if they hadn't been abusing their market power for a decade.

If Apple had instead chosen to lower their app store fee, to 5%, then we could have gotten the best of all worlds, which is a focus on privacy, and no monopolistic fees.

Its too late for that now. If only Apple hadn't fought these efforts so much, they could have given everyone a worthwhile compromise.