Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by mptest 1154 days ago
That's what your lawyer would say is the case is the impression I got. Or, more seriously, perhaps that could be a toggle. Similar to how if you hit the panic button on iphones it no longer takes biometrics until you give it the code? That might solve for ease of use.
1 comments

Lawyers aren't allowed to lie in court.

Hitting a panic button would mostly likely qualify as evidence tampering, disruption of investigation, or evasion of justice.

These were non-uniformed undercover police that intercepted the guy. In this scenario it's very plausible to think you're about to be robbed, and hitting a 'lock device until I return home' panic button could never be considered any of those things given the circumstances (under UK law, anyway.)