|
|
|
|
|
|
by staticman2
1148 days ago
|
|
|
It's banally true that intentionally putting an A.I. in charge of our nucleur arsenal might be dangerous. My point is someone can answer a survey stating A.I. could destroy our species without believing GPT-4 is existentially dangerous. |
|
|
Not everyone is equally educated, the two are not mutually exclusive.
People can say either. Educated, rational and reasonable people would say yes on both if they do the risk management analysis and understand the factors driving how it will be used.