[Dylan16807]

It's fine to consider the web app code as part of "ChatGPT".

But you shouldn't say that and also say "ChatGPT is an AI" at the same time. Those are two slightly but importantly different definitions of "ChatGPT".

Looking at your glossary here, the definition of "AI incident" should probably be adjusted, and in its current form it should not be taken too literally. Because if a server fell over on someone, and that server was hosting an AI, that would technically fit your definition.

[smcgregor]

Great point! We are constantly discussing the criteria. For example, if a robot lost power and fell on someone, do you think that is an incident? What if the robot was never turned on and fell on someone in shipping? When these challenges come up, we try to expand the editing guide to meet the challenge of all the ways intelligence of the artificial variety can go wrong.