|
|
|
|
|
by mztwo
1151 days ago
|
|
What's so shocking in the brashness of their claims:
- UMG alleges that training generative AI on any of their artists is a "breach of our agreements and a violation of copyright law."
- We are asked, which side of history to we want to be on? Apparently, original AI-generated content that imitates artists is siding with "deep fakes, fraud, and denying artists their due compensation." The song was labeled as a wholly original, AI-generated song and in now way misrepresented itself. Many of my lawyer friends say this is testing new boundaries on copyright law because of what UMG is claiming. |
|