|
|
|
|
|
by jag3421
1164 days ago
|
|
Your argument is riddled with strawmen. Eugenics is clearly helpful if you have a strategy selected (breeding for intelligence, strength, etc) and is witnessed in horse breeding, dog breeding, etc, and why top dollar is paid for the offspring of prize winning horses when they are studded out. You should instead attempt to make a compelling argument how it does not apply to humans. That would be worth reading, instead of strawman arguments. |
|
Does many generations of slavery and the associated genetic selection for winning survival strategies impose shifting genetic attributes to the surviving population?
---------
re: below [due to rate limiting]
Appreciate the honest reply.
>The death rates for slaves was 1.8%
Ah but I suspect this was after arrival in the mainland. There was a "seasoning" process in the "west indies" where as much as 50% of slaves perished before arriving to market. And I don't think that includes the long voyage across the Pacific nor between capture and initial sale.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seasoning_(slavery)