[sdfghswe]

> Now, I definitely prefer the US's stance of a password being illegal self-discrimination

Is that true though? Never heard that before.

[NoMoreNicksLeft]

It's somewhat up in the air. The prevailing theory is that the 5th protects against compelling what amounts to testimony... but it's only been tested a few times in court, never by SCOTUS. With mixed results.

[sdfghswe]

Is there a way I can learn more about this? A resource for non-lawyers.

[P_I_Staker]

btw, I think OP meant incrimination

[sdfghswe]

I understood what he meant, and in fact I even missed the typo until you pointed it out.