|
|
|
|
|
by charcircuit
1165 days ago
|
|
>Why should they? Because they may want to provide user value by being a centralized place where you can manage all of your virtual items and NFTs are a component of that. >it's not worth anything because nobody else sees any value in it now that the rental place is gone. These items can be reused by other applications to give them a new life. Even in your DVD store example a competing DVD store or streaming service could offer you a sign up bonus or discount if you could prove you had €5 or more credit with the store that went out of business. >Much like micro transactions, this is making the game less enjoyable just to milk some players I see it more as the opposite. Letting someone sell the skins they bought to someone else is better for the consumer and isn't just milking them compared to games like Fortnite where nothing can be sold off. |
|
This makes no sense at all, why should a company give me some credit based on credit I had with another company that is even out of business? I could see it working if the two companies are competitors, but if one of the two is out of business it isn't a competitor anymore.