Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by squirtle24 1156 days ago
> Yes, but there's presumably a difference between deleting evidence vs. not having it in the first place.

In the article it seems Google's "history off" feature isn't really history-off so much as it simply auto-deletes after 24h. If the chats were never logged, would they have avoided this?

Also how far does the law go regarding deletion - I mean if a message was stored in memory and then released/garbage collected does that still count as "deleting evidence"? Because if so, then virtually any means of electronic communication might be counted as "deleting evidence". For example a voip call audio buffer that gets deleted.

(Just thinking out loud, not that I would ever want to circumvent the law)

2 comments

Not a lawyer, but my amateur guess is the answer to your first question would be yes, and the answer to your second question would be no, because of the common-sense understanding of how computer storage works and what it means to delete something. There's no need to have an information-theoretic definition of "destruction" here.
Relevant law cited elsewhere in the thread: "(e) Failure to Preserve Electronically Stored Information. If electronically stored information that should have been preserved in the anticipation or conduct of litigation is lost because a party failed to take reasonable steps to preserve it, and it cannot be restored or replaced through additional discovery, the court ..."

The key word is "reasonable", which is what the court must decide happened here. OTOH deliberately enabling "history off" doesn't sound like a reasonable steps to preserve records under legal hold. Having said that, I wonder if it also means voip/video calls must be recorded, especially if the feature is available in whatever app they use. Further, even if they use a purpose built "off the record" app, deliberately choosing to use such an app could be argued as failure to reasonably preserve records, if a regular history-preserving app is available. So I think the answer to my first question could be a no.

The key word to me is "stored". The common-sense definition of storage refers to non-volatile storage, not RAM or data in transit.
Phone calls and video chat are real time communication. They are expected to be ephemeral. Asynchronous text chat is not.
Should have used IRC!
Ytalk works without a server so even better.