[turtleyacht]

Maybe we can extrapolate Godel where a complete ruleset cannot be consistent, and a consistent ruleset cannot be complete.

Somewhere in there is the human ingenuity to adapt certain pathological patterns [1] that defeat (current) AI.

But it's not always obvious, and the composer sapiens must defy their own understanding of the rules to create a purposeful deviation (sometimes with help from other AI) [2].

The idea of sharing GPT prompts promotes the implication that results are deterministic. That helps QA, but humans love to play.

[1] Adversarial Policies Defeat Superhuman Go AIs: https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.00241

[2] Kellin Pelrine