|
|
|
|
|
by muser8
1161 days ago
|
|
Fantastic summary! I wonder if the economics will make enough sense to overcome entrenched interests and the legislation backing them. It be great to have efficient incandescent light and put the failed promises of LED longevity behind us. |
|
> It be great to have efficient incandescent light and put the failed promises of LED longevity behind us.
In my experience, the main failure mode of LED bulbs is the power supply -- they engineer every penny out of them even at the cost of reliability. Second, nearly all bulbs are dimmable, which complicates the power supply, because customers faced with dimmable vs non-dimmable will pick the dimmable one.
Another factor is if you read those claims about 20 year lifetimes and such, often there is a footnote saying something like "assuming it is on for 3 hours a day or less".
Finally, you are assuming that this new technology won't suffer the same fate as the LED bulbs. If they take off, they will be cost reduced at the expense of longevity. I saw the same thing happen in the era of floppy disks -- over time the price was reduced by a factor of 20 but reliability went down in parallel.