Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by rolph 1164 days ago
ChatGPT must be given a sense of ethics, is what i extend to from here. so we seem to be starting off with giving rightful attribution.

how far should that go? should an AI recognize that all data generated by human input, should be recognized as such, and derivations of data, are of automated artificial origin.

should an AI be allowed to learn what property rights are, and how to manage or physically effectuate them?

2 comments

From reading Reddit and seeing how people are dealing with Bing Chat's embedding of sources, it sounds like there is a lot of unanswered anxiety around what will happen to the internet if anything you put out there simply gets regurgitated by an LLM, often w/o attribution.

I'll be curious to see how this set of regulations helps put content attribution on a better path.

Stability AI, Midjourney, DeviantArt etc. have already been sued, so there will be a lot of action in the years ahead.

"Must". Simple assertions over variably subjective ethics won't mean a thing once the AI race really gets going.