|
|
|
|
|
by michelpp
1165 days ago
|
|
> That said if anyone from supabase reads this - I'd love to see GPG signing, version hashing/integrity verification, 2FA if it's not their already Yep, we've got all these on the road map, thanks! > and I know this one is a lot of extra work - but any type of automated even cursory glance for malicious code. Unfortunately a "cursory glance" is trivially sidestepped, and anything complete enough to be useful is probably impossible. Maybe you want to write an extension that automates logically replicating your data off the server, or truncates a table after processing it, to you that's useful, to someone else that's malicious, there's just no way to know. If you don't trust the authors then the only way to trust a TLE is to inspect the code yourself in the context of what "safe" means to you. The pytorch example you mentioned was very likely caught by a human, if an automated system were possible for python (but likely impossible) it would have caught it sooner. |
|