|
|
|
|
|
by falcolas
1168 days ago
|
|
That's an assumption that has not been tested in modern times. At least in the past, an artist could sell their painting. And even if the assumption proves to be true, the volume will decrease dramatically as people are no longer allowed to make a living to create their art. And no, Patreon and its ilk is not a sufficient replacement, not for full time jobs. It mostly doesn't even replace a job for the (comparatively few) people on it today. EDIT: I for one will miss movies like "Everything Everwhere All At Once", which could not have been made as an "impulse" project. |
|
It's a fact as old as humanity itself. People will create because that's what people do. What isn't guaranteed is the existence of the billion dollar copyright industry.
> an artist could sell their painting.
Still perfectly possible to sell the physical canvas you applied paint to.
> the volume will decrease dramatically as people are no longer allowed to make a living to create their art
So what? That's a good thing. The market is filled with cheap art that's made just to sell copies, stuff that wouldn't even exist at all if not for the profit. I don't consider that a big loss at all.