Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by Xunxi 1162 days ago
Good start but typical whac-a-mole implementing! Similar thing happened with girlsdoporn.

Most websites blocked search queries for the term or deleted it. Most got re-uploaded under more cryptic titles shortly afterwards.

It the video is popular, it'll resurface in multiple copies for redundancy.

It's not going to stop until there's a stringent requirement to upload videos.

1 comments

230 and 2257 always seemed at odds with each other. Sites aren't responsible for user content, but uploaders aren't compelled to attest to performers' ages and identities.

Generated content will throw a curveball at this. Claimants are not technically in the production.

Nah, 230 doesn't mean other laws disappear.