|
|
|
|
|
by Brian_K_White
1161 days ago
|
|
Scheduling and implementation are irrelevant to the complaint being made about high level languages. No matter what the cpu does internally to arrive at producing the requested output from the supplied instructions, it DOES produce exactly the reqested and expected output from the given instructions. What it does not do is for example maybe a + operator doesn't mean the same thing after some unknowable prior step changed the definition of +, or flatly not provide a means to manipulate some data in a way that a language author thought was crazy and no one could ever have a valid reason to do $thing like idk execute a string or something. Sure there are now optional settings and features you could consciously use, for example to enforce that data/exec seperation, but it doesn't just do it by it's own magic according to someone else's rules instead of your own code. |
|