[bharathyes]

both their release cycles and what they consider as stable might differ and not necessarily mean one is better.

yt-dlp still claims to keep track with the parent project. Most would use it for the additional functionalities it provides over youtube-dl.

[defrost]

There is much much more to the code base than simply youtube ripping, both can (in theory) also rip from (say) ABC Australia's iView, from the Royal Institute Christmas Lecture series, from redtube, etc (hundreds and hundreds of variations of websites).

That shim layer between the core ripping engine(s) and the manifold ways of embedding access to a stream is what is being kept current in yt-dlp releases (and -U updates).

Original most recent official youtube-dl (December 2021 release) can no longer find its update service.

[sli]

ytp-dl is also many, many times faster than the original, in my experience. youtube-dl is almost unusable for mass downloading by comparison.

[thaumasiotes]

> both their release cycles and what they consider as stable might differ and not necessarily mean one is better.

You're making it very difficult to take you seriously. Have you actually used youtube-dl?