|
|
|
|
|
|
by ctvo
1170 days ago
|
|
|
The original claim was the NYT abuses anonymous sources without citing anyone. The NYT, in the only occurrence of "researchers say" in the article, literally quote a person who's written a book on the subject on the next line. We can move the goal post and now debate the person's credentials, but we can do that because we know their name. |
|
|