Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by sdeer 1160 days ago
Śākya Gaṇarājya translates to English as Shakya Republic and that is actually correct. Kapilavastu was the capital of the Republic/Oligarchy of the Shakya clan. Buddha's father was the elected chief at the time of his birth. This is why one of his epithets is Shakyamuni ("muni" means sage so sage of the Shakyas.)

Strictly speaking Buddha was not a royal price but scion of an aristocratic family. As a comparison think of someone born in a patrician family of Rome when his father is a Consul of Rome. The Wikipedia article has good details about the Shakyas: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shakya
1 comments
denton-scratch 1160 days ago
> Strictly speaking Buddha was not a royal price but scion of an aristocratic family.

Is that so?

It was propheised at his birth (so the legend goes) that he would either become an enlightened teacher, or a "wheel-turning" world monarch (chakravartin). That doesn't prove he wasn't a royal prince, but then I guess I'm not sure exactly what a "prince" is.

link
ithkuil 1160 days ago
Prince is the son of a monarch. A monarch is the sole ruler (mono = one).

In an oligarchy you can still have powerful military rulers "whose chariot wheels roll everywhere"

To continue the comparison with the Roman republic. Consuls where great leaders bestowed with great power and honoured for their military successes. The Roman republic had a taboo of monarchy, one that Caesar himself played with dangerously and which got him killed.

link
denton-scratch 1160 days ago
Yabbut in some circumstances, a "prince" is effectively a king. I'm thinking of the princes in the Holy Roman Empire; they paid fealty to the Emperor, formally; but they were the masters of all they surveyed. And the word "prince" in literature often seems to mean exactly the same as "king".
link
argentier 1160 days ago
Princes are not necessary the sons of monarchs: independent principalities can and do exist (see for example Monaco).

Prince comes from princeps (the first), a title used by the Emperor Augustus.

link
ithkuil 1159 days ago
Well if we want to dig in the etymology then princeps meant the first in the order (in battle) of the soldiers. This was used during the Roman republic and the connotation was indeed that the first soldiers were the best, more experienced ones Over time Romans realized that it was more effective to not deploy their best soldiers first and so the princeps (the best most experienced soldiers) were in the back.
link