|
|
|
|
|
by rootusrootus
1162 days ago
|
|
> I am specifically talking about your urban/suburbanites that commute daily in their trucks, and use the bed once or twice a year for small home projects. The very definition of truthy. Sounds good, even without a shred of evidence to back it up. > A professional is going to be looking for something very different than an amateur home cook. I guess. The home cook might be inclined to buy an absurdly priced knife. The pro and competent home cooks both will reach for a basic Victorinox knife for everyday use. > He's probably not driving 2+ hours to a worksite out in the middle of no where, Most work trucks are driven around town. There's a niche for people who travel hundreds of miles in a day, but it's not the most common use case at all. The Lightning works great for >90% of all the usual things trucks get used for. |
|
This is comical. It's not even a real dispute to assert most truck owners don't use any of the truck functions. Owning a truck in the US is more of a status symbol than anything.
> I guess. The home cook might be inclined to buy an absurdly priced knife. The pro and competent home cooks both will reach for a basic Victorinox knife for everyday use.
You unintentionally make my point again.
> Most work trucks are driven around town. There's a niche for people who travel hundreds of miles in a day, but it's not the most common use case at all.
For a work truck, loaded with gear and whatever in the back, the Lightning is objectively a poor choice. It's range is awful, and no working truck is going to acceptably sit at the local Walmart for 3 hours charging mid-day either.
The Lightning is for a very particular type of truck buyer - the ones that don't actually need a truck but want a truck.
There's nothing wrong with that... but recognizing there's different types of buyers and products in the market should not be controversial.